curriculum studies (in the) Now transformations and possibilities

If you teach, design courses, or set policy, this book hands you the field's sharpest current questions in one place. It matters because curriculum decisions made today will define what the next generation knows and values. Read it if you work in teacher education, higher education, or schooling and want scholarship that names its own blind spots while imagining better futures.

1. 1Introduction

   Curriculum studies in the present tense

   The book's framing move is to ask what curriculum studies is now, in this moment, with all its unfinished business on the table. The stakes are high, because a field that cannot describe its present cannot shape its future.

   The idea

   The book's framing move is temporal. Curriculum studies is treated not as a fixed canon but as a field caught between what it inherited and what it owes the future. That stance lets the editors hold two truths at once: the field has matured into a recognised discipline, and it remains unsettled enough to reinvent itself. Readers expecting definitions will find questions instead, which is the point.

   Try this: Write one sentence describing your field or role in the present tense, then list what it still owes the future.

2. 2Decolonisation chapters

   Decolonisation is curriculum work, not slogan work

   The book's decolonisation chapters press toward honesty: decolonisation as sustained intellectual labour rather than a compliance exercise.

   The idea

   What surprises readers is the insistence that decolonising curriculum cannot be outsourced to policy documents or one-off workshops. It requires rethinking the relationship between knowledge, power and who gets to authorise what is taught. The chapters treat this as ongoing curriculum work with no finish line, demanding that academics examine their own disciplines' assumptions from the inside.

   Try this: Audit one course you teach or take: whose knowledge anchors it, and what would change if the anchor shifted?

3. 3Knowledge chapters

   Knowledge matters: the epistemic turn

   Scholars in these chapters argue that curriculum studies must take knowledge seriously, distinguishing powerful knowledge from everyday experience without dismissing either. The outcome is a field better equipped to say why some knowledge belongs in schools.

   The idea

   The insight is that social justice and knowledge are inseparable, not opposed. Denying learners access to systematic, powerful knowledge is itself an injustice, yet that knowledge must be selected and justified, not merely inherited. This position surprises readers who assume progressive means knowledge-light, and it gives curriculum makers a principled basis for hard choices about content.

   Try this: For one topic you teach, name the powerful knowledge it should open up, and check whether your materials actually deliver it.

4. 4Higher education chapters

   Curriculum in higher education: faculties as curriculum makers

   The outcome is a portrait of lecturers as curriculum makers whose choices deserve scrutiny and support.

   The idea

   The surprise is how much curriculum happens in rooms students never see. Recognising academics as curriculum makers reframes staff development as curriculum development, not an administrative afterthought.

   Try this: Attend or request the minutes of one curriculum committee in your institution and note what drives its decisions.

5. 5Teacher education chapters

   Teachers as curriculum interpreters, not deliverers

   The teacher education chapters show that no policy teaches itself. The outcome is a case for preparing teachers as thoughtful interpreters with professional judgement.

   The idea

   This reframes teacher education: the goal is not compliance with documents but cultivated judgement about how documents meet particular learners. That view surprises anyone who imagines curriculum implementation as delivery. It also explains why identical policies produce such different classrooms, and why investing in teachers' interpretive capacity pays off more than another policy rewrite.

   Try this: Pick one curriculum document you use and write down three interpretive choices you made that the document never specified.

6. 6Context and futures chapters

   Curriculum studies as a South African project with global reach

   The outcome is confidence, a curriculum studies community that knows where it stands and where it could go.

   The idea

   The insight is that context is not a limitation but a source of theory. Reading it elsewhere is not charity; it is engagement with theory made under pressure.

   Try this: Identify one local constraint in your context and ask what theoretical insight it forces that comfortable contexts miss.

Teacher educators, higher education lecturers involved in programme design, and curriculum policy workers will find this collection directly useful. Scholars and students of curriculum studies, especially those interested in decolonisation and knowledge debates, should read it too.

FAQ