THE PERSON OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO ST. AQUINAS
In 60 seconds
Gagliardi walks through Thomas Aquinas's Christology: the hypostatic union, the communication of idioms, Christ's knowledge, wills, grace, and headship of the Church. Aquinas holds that in Christ there is one divine Person in two natures, so everything predicated of the man Jesus is predicated of God the Son. The book covers Christ's grace, his human knowledge, his two wills, and his role as Head of the Church and Mediator. It ends with the practical and devotional consequences: union with Christ, devotion to his humanity, and the Eucharist.
Before you start
Why it matters
Christology is where theology either holds together or falls apart, and Aquinas built the most durable synthesis in the tradition. Gagliardi makes that synthesis accessible without flattening it, showing how one Person in two natures answers questions from the Council of Chalcedon to modern debates. Read it if you teach, preach, study theology, or want to know why the Church says Mary is the Mother of God.
8 ideas, in the book's order
The big ideas
- 1early chapters on the hypostatic union
One Person, Two Natures: The Grammar That Holds
Aquinas takes up the classical problem: Christ is God and man, yet not two Christs. Following the definitions of Ephesus and Chalcedon, he argues that the eternal Person of the Word subsists in two complete natures, divine and human. The human nature has no personhood of its own; it is assumed by the Word. This resolves the ancient paradox without dividing or confusing what is united.
The idea
The hypostatic union is not a mixture or a moral union but a personal union: the second Person of the Trinity is the subject of everything said about Christ. That is why the man Jesus can be called God without equivocation. The surprise for many readers is that Aquinas's solution is grammatical as much as metaphysical: get the subject right and the sentences stop contradicting each other.
Try this: When you say 'God died on the Cross' this week, pause and notice you are speaking of the Person, not the divine nature; practice that distinction in prayer.
- 2chapters on the communication of idioms
The Communication of Idioms: God Was Born, Man Forgave Sins
Because there is one subject in Christ, properties of both natures can be predicated of that one Person. Aquinas works through the classic cases: the Word is made flesh, God is born of a virgin, the man Christ forgives sins, the man is worshipped. He distinguishes predication in the concrete from predication in the abstract, so 'God is man' is true while 'the divine nature is human' is not.
The idea
The rules for talking about Christ are not academic hair-splitting; they protect the Gospel claims. If you cannot say 'God died,' the Cross loses its saving power; if you say the divine nature died, you lose God. Aquinas gives the Church a language that keeps both truths. The concrete distinction is the tool most people have never been taught and it settles half the confusions on its own.
Try this: Take one line from the Creed about Christ and identify whether it names his Person, his divinity, or his humanity.
- 3chapters on Christ's grace
The Grace of Christ: Fullness at the Source
Aquinas asks whether Christ needed grace, being already the Son of God. He answers that Christ is full of grace as Head, the source from which grace flows to all members of the Church. Christ's grace is not merely habitual virtue added to a holy man; it is the grace of union itself, the personal union with the Word, which is the fountain of every other gift.
The idea
Christ's holiness is not an example we copy from a distance; it is a source we draw from. Aquinas distinguishes the grace of union from habitual and capital grace, and capital grace is what makes Christ the Head who gives life to the members. What surprises readers is that grace in Christ is treated with the same rigor as grace in us, yet ordered to his role as giver, not receiver.
Try this: Pray with John 1:16, 'grace upon grace,' and name one specific grace you received this week as coming from Christ's fullness.
- 4chapters on Christ's knowledge
Christ's Knowledge: The Man Who Knew Everything
Did the boy in the carpenter's shop know he was God? Aquinas says yes: in Christ there is beatific knowledge, the vision of God, from the first moment of his conception. Alongside it he has infused knowledge and acquired or experimental knowledge, learning as we do. There is no ignorance in Christ's human intellect, though he learns experientially what he already knows in the Word.
The idea
Aquinas refuses to solve the tension by shrinking Christ's mind. The Word assumed a human intellect, and that intellect is fulfilled by the vision of God; anything less would leave the union incomplete. Yet Christ still grows in experience, so the Gospels' language of learning is not a fiction. The surprise is that Aquinas can hold omniscience-in-the-Word and real human learning together without contradiction.
Try this: Read Luke 2:52 and ask what it means that Christ advanced in experience while never lacking the vision of God.
- 5chapters on Christ's wills
Two Wills, One Obedience: Gethsemane's Inner Logic
Aquinas defends two wills in Christ, divine and human, against the monothelite error. In Gethsemane the human will recoils from death while the human will of Christ adheres to the divine will; the agony is real, and so is the obedience. The lower powers of the soul feel fear, while the higher reason wills what the Father wills. One will of the Word governs, two natural wills operate.
The idea
The sixth ecumenical council's teaching, that Christ wills as man and as God, is what makes his obedience meaningful. If Christ had only one will, his prayer in the garden would be theater. Aquinas maps the wills onto the faculties of the soul, showing where the fear sits and where the consent sits. What surprises people is that the drama of Gethsemane is internal to Christ's own humanity, not a struggle against the Father.
Try this: Pray the Agony in the Garden slowly, naming the two movements: recoil in the flesh, consent in the will.
- 6chapters on Christ as Head of the Church
Head of the Church: Christ as the Body's Life-Giving Center
Aquinas develops Christ's headship: as Head, Christ gives the Holy Spirit, grace, and direction to the members. The head influences the members by the order of nature and by the excellence of his grace; the members are joined to the head by faith and charity. Christ's headship extends to angels in the order of nature but to men in the order of grace, since he is Head of the Church.
The idea
Headship is not a title of honor but a causal role: Christ actually produces holiness in the Church the way a head moves a body. This grounds the doctrine of the Mystical Body and the mediation of grace. The surprise is how organic Aquinas's ecclesiology is; the Church is not an organization Christ founded and left, but a living body continuously animated by its Head.
Try this: Name one way you depend on other members of the Church this week, and thank Christ the Head for the body's life.
- 7chapters on Christ as Mediator and Redeemer
Mediator and Redeemer: Why Satisfaction Works
Aquinas explains why Christ's Passion redeems: as Mediator, he is both God and man, able to offer satisfaction of infinite value on our behalf. The satisfaction works because of the charity with which Christ suffered, the dignity of his Person, and the union of his members with him. Redemption is not a payment extracted by the Father but an act of obedient love that superabounds over all sin.
The idea
The mechanics of redemption rest on the hypostatic union: only the God-man can satisfy for the human race, because only his acts have infinite worth. Aquinas stresses the interior cause, charity, over any external transaction. What surprises readers is that satisfaction is measured by love, not by the intensity of pain; the Cross saves because of who offers it and how he loves, not because suffering itself is currency.
Try this: At the Crucifix this week, say one concrete sin and entrust it to the satisfaction of Christ's charity.
- 8final chapters on devotion and the Eucharist
Consequences for Devotion: The Sacred Humanity and the Eucharist
Aquinas's Christology flows into practice: because the humanity of Christ is the instrument of his divinity, devotion to the Sacred Humanity is the way to the Word. The Eucharist gives us Christ's very body, so contact with his humanity is not a memory but a present touch. Aquinas's own Eucharistic hymns carry this theology into worship.
The idea
The doctrine of the hypostatic union is meant to be lived: touching Christ's humanity in the sacraments is touching the Person of the Word. Devotion to the Sacred Heart or to the Eucharist is not a lesser, sentimental path beside 'real' theology; it is the theology enacted. The surprise is how pastoral the Summa's Christology turns out to be at the end.
Try this: After Communion this week, address Christ by name in the silence, aware you are speaking to the Person of the Word.
A fair critique
Where it falls short
The book stays close to Aquinas's own texts and the scholastic framework, so readers looking for engagement with modern Christologies, historical Jesus research, or contemporary objections will find little. The style is expository rather than dialogical; rival positions are summarized briefly and answered rather than explored. Some chapters compress complex metaphysics, which can leave newcomers to scholasticism reaching for a dictionary. Those already convinced of Thomism will find confirmation; skeptics will need to bring their questions elsewhere.
In one sentence
In Christ one divine Person subsists in two natures, and every truth about Jesus, from his grace to his Gethsemane agony to his presence in the Eucharist, flows from that union.
Is it for you?
Who should read it
Seminary and university students who need a reliable map of Aquinas's Christology, and preachers or catechists who want doctrine they can teach without distortion. Also serious lay readers ready to move from devotional images of Jesus to the Church's precise grammar about him.
4 questions
Quick quiz: how well do you know THE PERSON OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO ST. AQUINAS?
0 of 4 answered
FAQ
What is THE PERSON OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO ST. AQUINAS about?
Mauro Gagliardi's book provides an in-depth exploration of St. Thomas Aquinas's Christology. It systematically analyzes Aquinas's teachings on the person of Jesus Christ, focusing on the hypostatic union, the coexistence of divine and human natures in one divine person, and the implications for understanding Christ's knowledge, will, and saving work. It's a scholarly examination of a central Christian doctrine.
Is THE PERSON OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO ST. AQUINAS worth reading?
Yes, for anyone interested in Catholic theology, Christology, or the thought of St. Thomas Aquinas, this book is highly recommended. Gagliardi offers a clear, rigorous, and comprehensive exposition of complex theological concepts, making Aquinas's profound insights accessible while maintaining scholarly depth. It's an essential resource for students, theologians, and educated lay readers.
Who should read THE PERSON OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO ST. AQUINAS?
This book is ideal for students of theology, seminarians, priests, and scholars specializing in Christology or Thomistic studies. Educated lay readers with a strong interest in systematic theology and the historical development of Christian doctrine will also find it highly rewarding. It requires a foundational understanding of theological concepts.
How long does it take to read THE PERSON OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO ST. AQUINAS?
Based on its length of 288 pages and an average reading speed of 250 words per minute for academic texts, it would take approximately 345 minutes, or about 5 hours and 45 minutes, to read the entire book.
Who wrote THE PERSON OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO ST. AQUINAS?
THE PERSON OF CHRIST ACCORDING TO ST. AQUINAS was written by MAURO GAGLIARDI.