All Quiet at Mena

This is the book that finally gives the honest cops their say. If you think drug-war history is all kingpins and shootouts, Leveritt shows you the quieter crime: investigators who built real cases and watched them smothered by political convenience. It matters for anyone who wants to understand how Arkansas actually worked in the 1980s, and for readers of The Boys on the Tracks and Devil's Knot who want the connective tissue. It's investigative reporting as endurance art.

1. 1early chapters

   A quiet airstrip with a loud secret

   Mena sits in the Ouachita Mountains of west Arkansas, the kind of town where the airport is a footnote. Leveritt opens on that deceptive calm: a small field with hangars, fuel trucks, and a reputation for nothing much. What the town didn't advertise was that the company operating there maintained and hid aircraft for Barry Seal, one of the most notorious smugglers of the era. The planes that ran the cocaine corridor south had a quiet berth in the Arkansas hills. The mismatch between the setting and the cargo is the engine of the whole book.

   The idea

   Leveritt's first move is geographic irony. Smuggling history gets written in Miami and Medellín, but the infrastructure that made it run was often tucked into places nobody thought to look. Mena worked precisely because it was boring. The lesson she draws is that concealment doesn't require remoteness, only indifference, and small-town airfields offered both. Readers who expect a thriller opening get something better: the slow realization that the scenery itself was the alibi.

   Try this: Look up your nearest small regional airport and check what companies are based there; you'll never read a hangar sign the same way again.

2. 2early-to-middle chapters

   The man whose planes needed a hiding place

   Barry Seal was the most flamboyant pilot-smuggler of his generation, and by the mid-1980s he had more enemies than friends. His aircraft needed servicing somewhere off the beaten path, and a company at Mena provided it: maintenance, hangar space, and discretion. Leveritt traces how the arrangement worked, the planes arriving for work that no legitimate charter fleet would need so often. The company gave Seal's operation a logistical heart in Arkansas while the public face of the business stayed bland. When Seal's world collapsed, the Mena connection became the thread investigators would pull for years.

   The idea

   What's striking is how mundane the arrangement was. No shadowy compound, just a company doing aircraft work and asking few questions. Leveritt shows that the smuggling economy ran on ordinary service businesses willing to stay incurious, and that Arkansas's role in the era has been systematically under-told. The surprise for most readers is that the state wasn't a bystander to the drug trade's logistics; it was, at Mena, a host.

   Try this: When a scandal breaks, trace the boring vendors: the maintenance firms, the landlords, the fuel suppliers. That's where the story usually lives.

3. 3middle chapters

   The IRS agents who counted what nobody wanted counted

   Leveritt's richest material comes from IRS investigators who spent years watching Mena and kept meticulous records of what they saw. She interviews them and works from their files: aircraft movements, financial anomalies, the pattern of a fleet that didn't behave like any legitimate operation. These agents did the unglamorous work of building a paper case, believing that if the money and the planes could be documented, the operation could be stopped. Their cooperation with Leveritt, decades later, is what lets her reconstruct the surveillance in detail. They watched; they wrote; they waited for someone upstairs to act.

   The idea

   The book's quiet heroism belongs to paper-pushers. While popular memory of the drug war fixates on agents with badges drawn, Leveritt shows that financial investigators built the most durable record of what happened at Mena. Their files survived the political weather that destroyed other efforts. The surprise is how much truth sat in government filing cabinets all along, waiting for a FOI request and a reporter stubborn enough to read it all.

   Try this: File one FOI request this month on anything you've ever wondered about; Leveritt's book is proof the paperwork can outlive the coverup.

4. 4middle chapters

   State police who watched for years

   Alongside the federal investigators, Arkansas state police kept their own long surveillance on activities at the Mena airport. Leveritt draws on their cooperation and their records: years of observation, reports filed upward, and the growing frustration of officers who could see what the airfield was hosting. They documented the traffic and the people around the company that serviced Seal's aircraft. Their work paralleled the IRS effort, a second set of eyes on the same hangars. Between the two agencies, the activity at Mena was watched longer and more closely than almost anything else in the state at the time.

   The idea

   Two law enforcement agencies, years of observation, and still the airport operated. Leveritt uses that overlap to make her sharpest point: the failure at Mena wasn't ignorance. The knowledge existed in duplicate, in two bureaucracies, documented and current. What was missing was the will to convert watching into stopping. For readers raised on incompetence narratives, this is the book's most uncomfortable finding: the system saw everything and chose, at the top, to do nothing with what it saw.

   Try this: Next time an official scandal is called an 'intelligence failure,' ask what the front-line investigators actually documented before the word 'failure' was coined.

5. 5later chapters

   Politics as the final gatekeeper

   The investigators' files kept moving up the chain, and that's where they died. Leveritt reconstructs how political considerations, not evidentiary ones, determined what happened to the Mena material. Cases that should have been pursued were deflected; questions that should have been asked in public weren't. The agents who had done the watching watched instead as their work was absorbed, delayed, and quietly shelved. The airport's business continued through the years the paperwork traveled nowhere. Leveritt's account makes the obstruction itself the crime story.

   The idea

   Here is the book's core argument: the conflict at Mena was never really police versus smugglers. It was police work versus politics, and politics won at every gate that mattered. Leveritt shows that the most effective protection the operation had wasn't gunfire or bribes but the simple power to decide which cases got resources. Readers who came for a smuggling tale leave with a civics lesson they didn't expect, one about who controls the machinery after the evidence is gathered.

   Try this: Pick one closed case in your state's history and find out who had the authority to shelve it; follow the authority, not the evidence.

6. 6throughout

   FOI documents as the reporter's crowbar

   Much of what Leveritt establishes comes from documents pried loose under the Freedom of Information Act, layered over the recollections of the IRS and state police investigators themselves. She describes assembling the record piece by piece: reports that existed but had never been shared between agencies, files that answered questions the official record pretended hadn't been asked. The documents let her name what happened at Mena with specificity rather than rumor, which is what separated her account from the conspiracy talk that had long swirled around the airport. The paper trail became the book's spine.

   The idea

   Leveritt's method is the antidote to both official silence and internet mythology. Mena had spent years as a magnet for wild theories; her answer was not to speculate louder but to document harder. The FOI record let her say exactly what was known and when, no more and no less. The surprise is how much can be proven without a single anonymous source, if you're willing to wait out the bureaucracy. It's a masterclass in replacing legend with paper.

   Try this: When a story feels conspiracy-shaped, search for the FOI-released documents first; the boring paper usually beats the exciting theory.

7. 7throughout

   A wealth of new information, finally on the record

   Reviewers noted that Leveritt contributed a wealth of new information to a story long told in fragments. Working with the investigators' cooperation and the FOI record, she assembled details that had never appeared in one place: the scope of the surveillance, the identities and roles of the people watching, the specific years of observation at the airport. Readers who thought they knew the Mena story from news clips discovered how much had never been reported at all. The book became the first complete accounting of what the record actually showed.

   The idea

   There's a particular value in being the first to write something down completely. Leveritt's contribution wasn't a leak or a bombshell; it was synthesis, the patient joining of documents and witnesses into a single narrative. The surprise is that no one had done it before, given how much material existed.

   Try this: Choose a half-known story from your region and try to find one complete account of it; if none exists, you've found someone's next book.

8. 8reception

   The Arkansas State Library calls it a gem

   The Arkansas State Library listed All Quiet at Mena as a 'gem,' a small institutional nod with real weight. Leveritt had spent her career reporting on the state, from the prison plasma scandal she exposed in 1991 to the books that followed, and this final work returned to Arkansas soil one last time. The state's own library system, the keeper of its official memory, effectively endorsed the account of what had been allowed to happen at Mena. For a book about a state that didn't want to know, the recognition landed with quiet irony.

   The idea

   Institutional validation matters most when it comes from the institution the book indicts. Leveritt had built her reputation on Arkansas stories the state found uncomfortable, and by her final book the state's own library was pointing readers to her work. The surprise is that acknowledgment and accountability can arrive decades apart. It suggests that official memory is not fixed; it can be rewritten by reporters who simply refuse to let the file close.

   Try this: Check your state library's catalog for the investigative books about your state; see which ones the institution itself flags as essential.

9. 9framing

   The last case in a career of them

   Leveritt came to Mena after decades of Arkansas investigations: the 1991 reporting on prison plasma that ended a program linked to thousands of HIV and hepatitis C infections in Canada, then The Boys on the Tracks, then Devil's Knot and Dark Spell. All Quiet at Mena was her final book, and it carried the same signature: cases where the official machinery failed the people it served. She had left newspaper reporting in 1995 precisely to write these in-depth accounts. Mena was the story she chose to end on.

   The idea

   Read as a career capstone, the book gains force. Leveritt spent thirty years documenting the same pattern in different costumes: evidence gathered, truth known, and power declining to act. Mena was perhaps her purest version of that pattern because the smugglers weren't even the main antagonist; the antagonist was the decision not to pursue. Readers who know her earlier work will recognize the hand immediately. New readers get the distilled version of everything she'd learned about how failure is manufactured.

   Try this: Read an author's last book after their first; the throughline tells you what they spent a lifetime trying to say.

10. 10closing chapters

    Why the planes kept flying

    Leveritt closes on the question the whole record raises: with two agencies watching for years, why did the operation at Mena continue as long as it did? Her assembled evidence points away from any single villain and toward a system in which every actor could defer to another. The IRS could wait on the prosecutors; the state police could wait on the feds; the politicians could wait on the politics. The airport's business ended not because Arkansas confronted it but because the era ended around it. The quiet at Mena, the title's promise, was the sound of a question officially never answered.

    The idea

    The book's final insight is about diffusion of responsibility as a cover in itself. No one had to kill the investigation; everyone just had to assume someone else owned it. Leveritt shows that this is how institutional failure actually looks from inside: not a dramatic decision but a chain of reasonable-sounding deferrals. The surprise is how little malice the record requires. Indifference, properly distributed, does the work of a conspiracy.

    Try this: In any stalled situation at work, ask one question: who exactly owns this? Vagueness there is where things go to die.

Readers of The Boys on the Tracks and Devil's Knot who want the rest of Leveritt's Arkansas, and anyone fascinated by how real investigations die quietly. Also essential for FOI nerds and fans of patient, document-driven true crime.

FAQ