Monster

This is the book that redefined what a young adult novel could look like: a courtroom drama told as a typed screenplay stitched with handwritten diary fragments, photographs, and film cues. It won the Printz Award and was a National Book Award finalist because it trusts teenagers with hard questions about race, guilt, and identity. Read it if you care about who gets believed in court — and who gets called a monster.

1. 1

   Act 1

   The Notebook They Let Him Keep

   A sixteen-year-old boy sits on a cot in a Manhattan detention center. Steve Harmon is awaiting trial for felony murder — the death of drugstore owner Alguinaldo Nesbitt — and he decides to record the whole ordeal as a movie screenplay, in the notebook he's allowed to keep, and he knows exactly what to call it. The prosecutor, he writes, called him a monster, so that's the title: MONSTER. His lawyer, Kathy O'Brien, lays out the stakes. The trial will likely last about a week, and only two of the four accused are being tried — Steve and James King — because Richard 'Bobo' Evans and Osvaldo Cruz have taken plea bargains. Steve flashes back to a film he watched in his high school film club, taught by Mr. Sawicki, about how movies are predictable. His life, he knows, is anything but.

2. 2

   Act 2

   Monsters on Trial

   Prosecutor Sandra Petrocelli opens by telling the jury the defendants are monsters — all equally guilty, she says: the one who grabbed the cigarettes, the one who wrestled for the gun, the one who checked the place to see if the store was empty, and the one who pulled the trigger. Salvatore Zinzi, a convicted criminal, admits he bought stolen cigarettes from Bobo Evans and heard about the Harlem drugstore robbery where Mr. Nesbitt was killed. Wendell Bolden, another cigarette buyer, testifies that Bobo told him James King pulled the trigger and that a kid named Steve was supposed to be the lookout. Then Osvaldo Cruz takes the stand — a member of the Diablos gang — and says he only participated because Bobo threatened him, that Bobo said he'd get the Diablos to cut him up if he didn't help. Cruz claims the plan was for Steve to enter the drugstore first, check if it was empty, and give a signal. Steve's screenplay shows his father visiting the detention center and breaking down crying, saying he'd dreamed of Steve attending Morehouse College, his alma mater. Steve also recalls his arrest — plainclothes officers coming to his family's Harlem apartment, handcuffing him, leading him out while his mother screamed and cried in the hallway. O'Brien warns him not to write anything in his notebook he wouldn't want the prosecutor to see.

3. 3

   Act 3

   The Lookout Question

   In a four-way split screen montage, the coroner testifies that Mr. Nesbitt died from a gunshot wound to the chest, the city clerk confirms the store's license, and a detective describes finding the murder weapon. Richard 'Bobo' Evans, who traded his freedom for his testimony, says James King shot Mr. Nesbitt during a struggle, and that Steve was supposed to walk into the store, check for customers, and come out to signal if the coast was clear — though he admits he barely knows Steve. Asa Briggs, King's lawyer, goes for the throat: the only eyewitness to the robbery saw just two men involved, which matches Bobo and Cruz, not King or Steve. Steve takes the stand and says he doesn't remember exactly where he was the day of the robbery, but insists he wasn't involved — he barely knows King and Cruz and doesn't know Bobo at all. O'Brien, who seems doubtful of his innocence, has him physically distance himself from King in the courtroom. In his journal, Steve admits he cannot psychologically handle writing down the details of the robbery itself. Briggs tells the jury in closing that the prosecution's case is built on the word of criminals who traded testimony for deals: 'You can't trust people who have already admitted they are liars.'

4. 4

   Act 4

   Verdict and the Mirror

   George Sawicki, Steve's film club teacher, testifies as a character witness, defending Steve's moral character. O'Brien argues Steve is not a monster but a young man who made a film about his ordeal, and that the prosecution has failed to prove he was part of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Petrocelli fires back that Steve is guilty as a lookout and participant, and tells the jury: 'This is not a movie. This is real life. And in real life, monsters do exist.' The jury finds James King guilty of felony murder. Steve Harmon is found not guilty on all charges. He reaches out to hug Kathy O'Brien — and she stiffens, turns away, and does not embrace him. Steve writes the question that haunts the rest of the book: 'What did she see in me that made her turn away?' Five months later, Steve is back home making films, but his father has moved away, and the distance between them is noticeable. He still wonders why O'Brien recoiled. He writes: 'I want to know who I am. I want to look in the mirror and know who I am. But I'm not sure.'

• SSteve HarmonA sixteen-year-old aspiring filmmaker from Harlem, on trial for felony murder as the alleged lookout in a drugstore robbery. He copes by writing his trial as a screenplay, and even after acquittal he can't stop asking whether the monster label was true.
• KKathy O'BrienSteve's defense lawyer, sharp and professional, who seems doubtful of his innocence and keeps him physically apart from King. Her refusal to hug him after the verdict is the book's most chilling moment.
• JJames KingThe older co-defendant accused of pulling the trigger, an acquaintance Steve barely knows. He is found guilty of felony murder.
• RRichard 'Bobo' EvansThe admitted participant who took a plea bargain and testified against King and Steve. He says King shot Mr. Nesbitt and that Steve was the lookout — while admitting he barely knows Steve.
• OOsvaldo CruzA Diablos gang member who took a plea bargain and testified that Bobo coerced him into the robbery. He claims Steve's role was to check the store and signal.
• SSandra PetrocelliThe prosecutor who brands the defendants 'monsters' and argues Steve is guilty as a lookout. She tells the jury that in real life, monsters do exist.
• AAsa BriggsJames King's lawyer, who attacks the prosecution's case by pointing out the only eyewitness saw two men — Bobo and Cruz — and that its witnesses are admitted liars trading testimony for deals.
• GGeorge SawickiSteve's film club teacher, the man who taught him movies are predictable. He testifies as a character witness, defending Steve's moral character.
• SSteve's fatherA father who dreamed of his son attending Morehouse College, his alma mater. He breaks down crying during a prison visit, and five months after the trial he has moved away, leaving a noticeable distance between them.

The striped T-shirt

In the book's black-and-white photographs, Steve appears in an oversized T-shirt bearing horizontal stripes — prison-adjacent clothing worn in ordinary settings, possibly after release. The stripes echo a uniform he never chose and can't take off: whatever the jury decided, the mark of the trial stays on his body. Freedom, the photos suggest, is partial at best.

The screenplay format

Steve's typed script with its FADE IN and FADE OUT cues is a shield — he distances himself from trauma by turning his life into a movie he directs. But the format also traps him: movies are predictable, as his film club film taught, and his life is not. The form he chose to survive becomes the form that keeps the question open.

The notebook

The notebook Steve is allowed to keep is both a lifeline and a liability. O'Brien warns him not to write anything he wouldn't want the prosecutor to see — even his private thoughts are evidence. It stands for the double bind of his whole situation: writing is how he stays human, and it's also how he could be convicted.

The mirror

Steve's final wish — to look in the mirror and know who he is — makes the mirror the book's last symbol. The trial was a public mirror in which others saw a monster; the acquittal clears his record but not his reflection. What he sees there remains unresolved, which is the book's honest ending.

The ending refuses the comfort a not-guilty verdict usually promises. Steve walks free, but the acquittal answers a legal question, not a human one. O'Brien's stiffening and turn away is the hinge: his own lawyer, who spent weeks arguing his innocence, cannot bring herself to touch him — and Steve reads that as her seeing something in him he can't see himself. Two readings compete. One is that O'Brien suspected his guilt all along and the verdict freed a guilty boy, which would make the ending a quiet horror story. The other is that she simply absorbed the machinery she worked inside — after months of treating Steve as a case file, she no longer knew how to treat him as a kid. The book won't choose for you. What it does insist on is the cost: his father has moved away, the distance is noticeable, and Steve's last written words are about not being sure who he is. The ending lands because it denies the reader the closure the jury gave Steve. He was found not guilty. He was not found innocent — and neither, the book suggests, was anyone else in that courtroom.

1. 1.Is Steve guilty? The prosecution's case rests entirely on witnesses who took deals — Bobo admits he barely knows Steve — yet O'Brien's refusal to hug him suggests she believed something. Weigh the evidence the book actually gives you and argue a verdict the jury couldn't.

Anyone who has ever watched a courtroom drama and wondered what it would feel like to be the defendant — especially readers who like books that refuse to tell them what to think. It's essential for teens who look in the mirror and aren't sure who stares back, and for adults who remember that feeling.

FAQ